Hlengiwe Mtshali1 , Domitilla C. Raimondo1 , Dewidine van Der Colff1 , Lize von Staden1 , Nokukhanya N. Nozipho1 , Shae-Lynn E. Hendricks1 , Maphale S. Monyeki1

1. South African National Biodiversity Institute

Published

November 11, 2025


Ixia ebrahimiiIxia ebrahimii, a new Ixia species found by the Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers (CREW) team. Image credits: © Ismail Ebrahim
17%
taxa assessed
Threatened
70%
taxa assessed
Well Protected
14%
taxa assessed
Not protected

Key findings

  • South Africa’s flora shows very high levels of species diversity and endemism: 13,642 of the 20,248 taxa (67%), with high concentration in the Fynbos biome.

  • 1 in 5 endemic taxa are threatened.

  • Trends in species status over time were assessed using a representative sample of 900 plant taxa, revealing an increase in extinction risks. Plants threatened with extinction increased by 2% between 2017 and 2024.

  • Declining trends are driven mainly by habitat loss and further intensified by invasive species, illegal harvesting, and the intensifying impacts of climate change.

  • Protected area expansion has improved plant protection.

Figure 1. Density of threatened plant species (10 x 10 km grid) based on a representative sample of 900 species. Highest concentrations occur in the Cape Floristic Region — a global biodiversity hotspot with exceptional richness and high levels of threat.

Protection level

Plants were assessed using a representative sample of 900 taxa. Peripheral taxa with less than 5% of their distribution in South Africa were excluded from the analysis. Protection levels were calculated for this sample to track changes in extinction risk over time (see the technical approach here).

The analysis indicates an overall increase in the number of Well Protected species, while species in the Poorly Protected and Moderately Protected categories showed only minor changes. Of the 900 species assessed, 72 (8%) shifted protection level categories between 2017 and 2024. Most of these changes (60) were positive, driven primarily by improved management and the establishment of new protected areas. However, deterioration in management effectiveness at eight protected areas led to a decrease in the Protection Level for 12 species. Plant species are severely affected by threats occurring within protected area boundaries, leading to a downgrade in their protection category. The main reason for the ineffectiveness of these protected areas is the high level of plant poaching in the protected area of Namaqualand.

Many species have shown an improvement in their protection levels since the last assessment in 2018. A total of 5% of the assessed plant species now have better protection, largely due to the proclamation of the Mountain Zebra–Camdeboo Protected Environment, Gamsberg Nature Reserve, and Orange River Mouth Nature Reserve.

Figure 6. Protection level results of South African plant taxa. Representative sample (900 plants) (A), and representative sample of endemics (B). Most taxa are well protected, but a notable proportion remains poorly or not protected.
Figure 7. Daubenya namaquensis, a rare and restricted range species from Namaqualand experienced a genuine improvement in protection level status as a result of the declaration of new protected areas between 2018 and 2025. © Nick Helme (CC-BY-NC).

To contribute data to future Red List and Protection Level assessments of plant species, you can join the Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers (CREW) Programme – a citizen-science initiative focused on the monitoring and conservation of South Africa’s threatened plants.

For more information, contact CREW at 📧. Alternatively, join the iNaturalist citizen science projects: South African Red List: Plants and Animals and redlist (s Afr)

New to iNaturalist (or never heard of it) and want to play along? Watch these video tutorials to get started, and sign up on the iNaturalist website or download the app on your smartphone. To see how valuable your nature photographs can be, watch this inspiring TED talk.

Species recovery

As part of the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) Target 4, signatories are committed to taking urgent action to halt human-induced extinctions, reduce species’ risk of extinction, and improve their conservation status by 2030. Achieving this target requires coordinated efforts to prevent and reverse species declines, recover and conserve populations, and maintain genetic diversity, particularly among threatened species. South Africa has initiated a process with each taxonomic group that has comprehensive Red List assessments for their taxonomic groups, to identify and prioritise species in urgent need of recovery to contribute to achieving the GBF Target 4 goals.

With over 3000 plants threatened with extinction, multiple interventions to address threatened species declines are required, including the expansion of protected areas, the restoration of habitats that are being degraded by invasive species, and the inclusion of threatened plants in biodiversity sector plans. In addition, 293 critically endangered and endangered plants need active recovery projects to take place in order to ensure that they do not go extinct in the next decade. Between 2020 and 2023, the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) led a process to prioritise plants in urgent need of recovery, using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria to select those in most urgent need of recovery. A species recovery working group with conservation agencies and indigenous plant growers has been established, and each stakeholder has been allocated a handful of species to implement recovery work on. A major upscaling of resources to support species recovery is required, as only 14 of the 293 species that require recovery have active recovery projects implemented.

Below are two examples of critically endangered plant species that require urgent recovery interventions to ensure their long-term survival. The accompanying flyers outline the key activities needed, including habitat restoration, population reinforcement, and threat mitigation. If you would like to financially support the recovery of a critically endangered plant taxa from extinction, , please contact Ismail Ebrahim at i.Ebrahim@sanbi.org.za

box_3_fig_1 box_3_fig_2

Acknowledgement 

Coordinated by:

bplants_1_fig_2

Funded by:

Data sources

  1. South African Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). 2024. Statistics: Red List of South African Plants. Available at: http://Redlist.sanbi.org . Accessed August 27, 2025.

  2. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). 2019. National Biodiversity Assessment 2018: The status of South Africa’s ecosystems and biodiversity. Synthesis Report. South African National Biodiversity Institute, an entity of the Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries, Pretoria. pp. 1–214.

References

1. Butchart, S.H.M. et al. 2004. Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red list indices for birds. PLoS Biology 2: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383